WAEC 2026 LITERATURE IN ENGLISH ANSWERS ( OBJ & PROSE)

BEST EXPO RUNZ ASSISTANCE WEBSITE. NO.1 BEST DELIVERY OF EXAM RUNZ

100% GUARANTEE OF GETTING ANSWERS MIDNIGHT..IT’S OUR CULTURE, NO DOUBT

===================================

LITERATURE OBJ
01-10: DCDCADBBDB
11-20: BBDBDDBBDD
21-30: DACCACCACC
31-40: BBDDCBDBBD
41-50: CCBAABBBDD

COMPLETED
===================================

SECTION A: ANSWER ONE (1) QUESTION ONLY

(1)
In Pede Hollist’s So the Path Does Not Die explores the themes of sexism, corruption, gender inequality, and the struggle for female dignity in a patriarchal society. These ideas are reflected in Finaba’s first encounter with Sidibe Kakay, where she is immediately exposed to male dominance, material manipulation, and an attempt to undermine her moral integrity.

Finaba Marah is the central character of the novel. She is a strong-willed young woman who has endured traumatic experiences and social oppression but remains principled and determined to maintain her dignity. Sidibe Kakay, on the other hand, is a wealthy and influential man linked to diamond dealings. He represents moral corruption and male entitlement, often using wealth and influence to control and exploit women.

During their first encounter at the clinic where Finaba works, Sidibe attempts to use his wealth and influence to pressure her into giving him excessive drugs beyond what is medically appropriate. He assumes that her position as a working woman makes her vulnerable to bribery, but Finaba firmly rejects his request, demonstrating her honesty and professional integrity.

Sidibe does not accept her refusal. Instead, he becomes more determined and begins to see Finaba as a challenge and someone to be “acquired.” His attitude reflects a sexist belief that women can be won over through wealth and persistence, revealing the moral corruption and materialistic values he represents in society.

Finaba’s resistance to Sidibe establishes her as a woman of strong moral character. Her refusal to be controlled or bought highlights her independence and dignity, even in the face of powerful male influence. This encounter introduces her as a symbol of female resilience in a society dominated by exploitation and gender inequality.

In conclusion, Finaba’s first encounter with Sidibe Kakay highlights the conflict between female integrity and male exploitation in the novel. It marks the beginning of a recurring struggle in her life, where she consistently defends her dignity against those who attempt to use wealth and power to control her.
===================================

(4)
The issue of justice, corruption, accountability and reconciliation is a major concern in society as it reflects the struggle to rebuild fairness in a community after conflict. This theme is clearly explored in Redemption Road by Elma Shaw, where it is presented through the contrasting experiences of Bendu Lewis and Moses Varney (formerly Commander Cobra) in their pursuit of justice.

Bendu Lewis is the protagonist of the novel. A survivor of the Liberian Civil War, she suffered abuse and extreme hardship at the hands of rebel fighters, including rape and forced conscription. In the present narrative, she is the founder of Peace in Practice (PIP), an NGO dedicated to helping war victims overcome trauma. She is courageous, determined and morally driven, firmly believing that without justice there can be no lasting peace. She therefore serves as the main vehicle through which the theme of justice is developed in the novel.

Moses Varney, formerly known as Commander Cobra, is the principal antagonist. During the civil war, he was a ruthless warlord who led rebel forces at the Duluma Camp, committing numerous atrocities including killings, rape and widespread violence against civilians. After the war and the election of a new government, he assumes a new identity as Moses Varney and engages in arms trafficking, operating secretly while maintaining corrupt ties with government officials and the judiciary.

Bendu’s quest for justice is mainly pursued through legal means. Strongly believing that perpetrators of war crimes must be held accountable, she reports Moses Varney to the police in order to have him arrested and prosecuted. To her, it is unjust for those responsible for atrocities to escape punishment. She is also disturbed by the idea that known war criminals can occupy positions of influence in society. To strengthen her case, she seeks the help of Calvin, who secures a lawyer from the Thomas and Reeves Law Firm. Her pursuit is not only personal but also representative of many victims who lack the power to seek justice.

Despite her determination, Bendu’s efforts are repeatedly hindered by corruption and institutional failure. The police are unable to properly act on her report, while the judicial system is deeply compromised. Judge Dagoseh, for example, is corrupt and accepts bribes, even engaging in arms deals with rebel networks, making fair justice impossible. Ironically, Bendu is later arrested and detained on false charges related to Moses Varney’s alleged murder, while her attempts to have him prosecuted for war crimes fail. The justice system she relies on ultimately becomes a tool of injustice against her, exposing the corruption in post war Liberia.

Moses Varney’s own pursuit of justice is entirely self serving and corrupt. Rather than accepting accountability for his crimes, he actively undermines justice to protect himself. When he learns of Bendu’s intention to expose him, he abducts her and violently intimidates her. He also continues his role in arms trafficking, using bribery and political connections to manipulate the justice system. Through allies such as Terrance and Judge Dagoseh, he influences key officials, including the Police Director, Chief Keselly, to frame Bendu and suppress her case. His actions show a complete distortion of justice, where a war criminal not only avoids punishment but uses state institutions to persecute his victim.

In conclusion, the contrasting quests of Bendu and Moses Varney for justice in Redemption Road present a realistic portrayal of post war Liberia, where moral integrity clashes with systemic corruption. While Bendu’s sincere pursuit of accountability is consistently obstructed, Moses Varney exploits the same institutions for personal protection and power. Through these characters, Elma Shaw highlights the difficulty of achieving justice in a society still deeply scarred by war.
===================================

SECTION B: ANSWER ONE(1) QUESTION ONLY

(5)
Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird is set in the 1930s Southern town of Maycomb, Alabama, during the Jim Crow era. It vividly presents different forms of prejudice, especially racism, which systematically marginalises and dehumanises Black people in a white dominated society. The question concerns Tom Robinson, whose experience serves as the most powerful illustration of racism in the novel. Tom Robinson is a young married Black man with three children. He is kind, hardworking and morally upright, known for his dedication to church and his reliable work for Mr. Link Deas. He is the man defended by Atticus Finch in court against false accusations of rape and assault made by the Ewell family. Despite his physical disability in his left arm which makes it impossible for him to have committed the crime as alleged, he is still convicted by an all white jury. He later attempts to escape from prison and is shot dead. He represents the “mockingbird” figure, innocent, harmless and ultimately destroyed by a prejudiced society.

Tom Robinson’s ordeal begins with a false accusation that gains credibility in Maycomb only because of his race. He is a Black man who kindly helps Mayella Ewell with household chores out of compassion. However, when Mayella attempts to seduce him and is caught by her father Bob Ewell, she falsely accuses Tom of rape to protect her reputation. The white community immediately believes the accusation even before the trial begins. Although Atticus clearly proves in court that Tom’s disabled left arm makes it impossible for him to have caused Mayella’s injuries, the evidence is ignored due to racial bias. This shows how deeply racism influences judgment in Maycomb, where a white person’s word is valued over a Black man’s truth.

Tom Robinson’s trial is the clearest example of racial injustice in Maycomb’s legal system. The courtroom reflects the town’s racial hierarchy, as Black people are forced to sit in the balcony while white citizens occupy the main floor. Despite strong evidence presented by Atticus proving Tom’s innocence, the all white jury still convicts him. The verdict is based not on facts but on racial prejudice, as a Black man’s word is considered worthless against a white woman’s accusation. Even Judge Taylor, though fair minded and deliberately assigning Atticus to defend Tom, cannot prevent the racist outcome. The trial therefore exposes a legal system that denies justice to Black people purely on the basis of race.

Tom Robinson’s experience ends in tragedy. After losing hope in a justice system stacked against him, he attempts to escape from prison and is shot dead. His death deeply affects Jem, who becomes disillusioned by the injustice in society. The racism surrounding his case also affects his family, especially his wife Helen Robinson, who suffers emotional and social hardship after his death and continues to be harassed by Bob Ewell. Mr Link Deas eventually intervenes to protect her. Tom’s entire journey from false accusation to wrongful conviction to death shows that in Maycomb, innocence offers no protection to a Black man in a racist society.

In conclusion, Tom Robinson’s experience in To Kill a Mockingbird is the most powerful representation of racism in the novel. Through his false accusation, unjust trial and tragic death, Harper Lee exposes how racism corrupts justice, destroys innocent lives and dehumanises Black people. Tom Robinson stands as a true “mockingbird”, innocent and harmless, yet destroyed by a prejudiced society.
===================================

(7)
In Path of Lucas by Susanne Bellefuille, the writer explores themes of love, devotion, family responsibility and human endurance, showing how relationships are tested and strengthened through suffering and sacrifice in the lives of Lucas Clarkson and those closest to him. This theme is clearly reflected in the role of Isabelle Bourgeois, the wife of Lucas Clarkson, whose life as a spouse and mother is shaped by both deep affection and severe personal struggles.

Isabelle Bourgeois is a French Canadian woman married to Lucas Clarkson. She is portrayed as a deeply committed partner whose life is closely tied to her husband and family. Despite her troubled background, marked by childhood trauma, mental illness and physical challenges, she remains a central figure in Lucas’s life, offering emotional support and maintaining her role within the family unit even during periods of great difficulty.

Isabelle demonstrates strong devotion as a wife through her consistent support for Lucas in his personal and professional decisions. She stands by him throughout the challenges he faces, including his work as a mechanic and his decision to return to Alexandria to care for his sick father. In every situation, she remains loyal and supportive, making her an important pillar of stability in the household and strengthening the bond between them.

As a mother, Isabelle is responsible for raising five children, namely Richard, Johnny, Steve, Lucy and Thomas. Despite the financial pressure and emotional strain associated with a large family, she remains actively involved in their upbringing alongside Lucas. Her role as a mother reflects endurance and commitment, as she continues to care for her children even during the most demanding phases of her life.

However, Isabelle’s effectiveness as a wife and mother is sometimes affected by her unresolved psychological trauma. Having suffered abuse in her childhood, she carries emotional wounds that later contribute to mental health challenges, including psychotic depression and hospitalisation for an extended period. During this time, Lucas and his mother Elizabeth assume responsibility for maintaining the family structure, highlighting the extent to which Isabelle’s condition temporarily disrupts family stability.

Despite these struggles, Isabelle eventually recovers through the care, love and support of Lucas. She regains her mental stability and gradually returns to her normal family role. This recovery shows her inner resilience and determination to rebuild her life. She continues to live as a wife and mother until her death from a heart attack on June 10, 1993, leaving behind a legacy of endurance and devotion.

In conclusion, Isabelle Bourgeois is a complex but deeply sympathetic character whose life reflects both suffering and strength. As a wife, she remains loyal and supportive, and as a mother, she endures the challenges of raising a large family despite personal difficulties. Her story highlights the novel’s central message that love, resilience and family bonds can endure even in the face of profound human struggle.
===================================

COMPLETED….We Remain Your Favourite Site.
Ensure You Subscribe For Your Next Paper 

===================================